Thread:Ootwar/@comment-32049085-20200125230040/@comment-4939489-20200126113000

Timebomb192potato wrote: Ootwar wrote: Timebomb192potato wrote: Ootwar wrote: Timebomb192potato wrote:

Ootwar wrote: Timebomb192potato wrote: The first one is - what if CPN Holdings and Seagrounds Financial Group were to run some railway-related joint-ventures? This is because Seagrounds has a profitable railway division (even if half of the railways Seagrounds owns isn't listed on SFG Railway Operations' DFW page yet). One of my ideas is for assisting Amtrak and various New England transportation organizations on a set of state-supported Amtrak routes (similar to and ).

(Yes, Creator Provincialism is my second-favorite trope, and is why Gotaku is based out of Boston with much of it's dubbing work done by New Englanders) I could merge Qualis Railways in there. We should expand into international territories as well with this. I suggest Qualis Railways ends keeping the name but has a logo similar to Seagrounds (complete with the Seagrounds corporate symbol and the tagline "A Division of SFG Railway Operations"). Mmmmmm... I just prefer if Qualis Railways got rid of the name. It wasn't good or creative to begin with. How about or ? CPN and Seagrounds could license either name from CSX, and even paint the switcher engines in a retro scheme similar to the SCL/Seaboard schemes. 🤔 Eh... can we just come up with original names for stuff within our joint venture? All I have in mind is The CPN-Seagrounds Railways Partnership as a working title. If we do come up with a name for the parternship, we should keep the old Qualis Railways logo but change the text. No. The Q in the logo is part of the whole Qualis thing and it seems a bit too lazy.